My new campsite map website

Please visit my new campsite listing site ukcampingmap.co.uk

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Edge 238 - "Social Networks Are Like The Eye" Nicholas Christakis

"Best three or four hours of intense, enlightening reading you can do for the new year. Read it now." - San Francisco Chronicle

Edge 238 — February 25, 2008 — (7,500 words)

http://www.edge.org

This online EDGE edition with links and EDGE Video is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge238.html

----------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
----------------------------------------------------

It is customary to think about fashions in things like clothes or music
as spreading in a social network. But it turns out that all kinds of
things, many of them quite unexpected, can flow through social networks,
and this process obeys certain rules we are seeking to discover. We?ve
been investigating the spread of obesity through a network, the spread
of smoking cessation through a network, the spread of happiness through
a network, the spread of loneliness through a network, the spread of
altruism through a network. And we have been thinking about these kinds
of things while also keeping an eye on the fact that networks do not
just arise from nothing or for nothing. Very interesting rules
determine their structure.

SOCIAL NETWORKS ARE LIKE THE EYE
A Talk with Nicholas A. Christakis
EDGE Video

Introduction

On of the oft-repeated phrases on EDGE is "New Technologies=New
Perceptions". As we create tools we recreate ourselves. In the digital
information age, we have moved from thinking about silicon, transistors,
and microprocessors, to redefining, to the edge of creating life itself.
As we have seen in recent editions of EDGE — "Life: What A Concept!"
(Freeman Dyson, Craig Venter, George Church, Robert Shapiro, Dimitar Sasselov,
Seth Lloyd) at Eastover Farm in August, "Life: A Gene-Centric View"(Richard
Dawkins and Craig Venter) in Munich in January; "Engineering Biology"
(Drew Endy) in our most recent edition — we are redefining who and what we are.

Such scientific explorations are not limited to biology. Recently,
Harvard professor and sociologist Nicholas Christakis has shown that
there's more to think about regarding social networks such as Facebook,
MySpace, Flickr, and Twitter than considerations of advertising and
revenue models. According to TH NEW YORK TIMES, ("On Facebook,
Scholars Link Up With Data", by Stephanie Rosenbloom 12.17.07):

"Each day about 1,700 juniors at an East Coast college log on to
Facebook.com to accumulate "friends," compare movie preferences,
share videos and exchange cybercocktails and kisses. Unwittingly,
these students have become the subjects of academic research. To
study how personal tastes, habits and values affect the formation of
social relationships (and how social relationships affect tastes,
habits and values), a team of researchers from Harvard and the
University of California, Los Angeles, are monitoring the Facebook
profiles of an entire class of students at one college, which they
declined to name because it could compromise the integrity of their
research."

Christakis notes that he is "interested not in biological contagion, but
in social contagion. One possible mechanism is that I observe you and
you begin to display certain behaviors that I then copy. For example,
you might start running and then I might start running. Or you might
invite me to go running with you. Or you might start eating certain
fatty foods and I might start copying that behavior and eat fatty foods.
Or you might take me with you to restaurants where I might eat fatty
foods. What spreads from person to person is a behavior, and it is the
behavior that we both might exhibit that then contributes to our changes
in body size. So, the spread of behaviors from person to person might
cause or underlie the spread of obesity."

In a page one story in THE NEW YORK TIMES last summer ("Find Yourself
Packing It On? Blame Friends" 7.26.07), Gina Kolata noted:

"Obesity can spread from person to person, much like a virus,
researchers are reporting today. When one person gains weight, close
friends tend to gain weight, too.

"Their study, published in THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE,
involved a detailed analysis of a large social network of 12,067
people who had been closely followed for 32 years, from 1971 to 2003.

"The investigators knew who was friends with whom as well as who was
a spouse or sibling or neighbor, and they knew how much each person
weighed at various times over three decades. That let them
reconstruct what happened over the years as individuals became
obese. Did their friends also become obese? Did family members? Or
neighbors?

"The answer, the researchers report, was that people were most likely
to become obese when a friend became obese. That increased a
person?s chances of becoming obese by 57 percent. There was no
effect when a neighbor gained or lost weight, however, and family
members had less influence than friends.

"It did not even matter if the friend was hundreds of miles away, the
influence remained. And the greatest influence of all was between
close mutual friends. There, if one became obese, the other had a
171 percent increased chance of becoming obese, too." ...

Chtistakis, along with his colleague James Fowler, "have started with
several projects that seek to understand the processes of contagion, and
we have also begun a body of work looking at the processes of network
formation ? how structure starts and why it changes. We have made some
empirical discoveries about the nature of contagion within networks. And
also, in the latter case, with respect to how networks arise, we imagine
that the formation of networks obeys certain fundamental biological,
genetic, physiological, sociological, and technological rules. "

"So we have been investigating both what causes networks to form and how
networks operate."

— JB

EDGE Video

NICHOLAS A. CHRISTAKIS, a physician and sociologist, is a Professor at Harvard University with joint appointments in the Departments of Health Care Policy, Sociology, and Medicine. For the last ten years, he has been studying social networks.

[more]

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
This online EDGE edition with links and EDGE Video is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge238.html

----------------------------------------------------
Edge Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
EDGE

John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher
Karla Taylor, Editorial Assistant

Copyright (c) 2008 by EDGE Foundation, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Published by EDGE Foundation, Inc.,
5 East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
EDGE Newsbytes:

SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE: "The world's finest minds have responded with some of the most insightful, humbling, fascinating confessions and anecdotes, an intellectual treasure trove. ... Best three or four hours of intense, enlightening reading you can do for the new year. Read it now."

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG: "These are thoughts to make jaws drop...Nobody at Eastover Farm seemed afraid of a eugenic revival. What in German circles would have released violent controversies, here drifts by unopposed under mighty maple trees that gently whisper in the breeze."

SUEDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG: "'Life: What A Concept' was one of those memorable events that people in years to come will see as a crucial moment in history. After all, it's where the dawning of the age of biology was officially announced."

PUBLICO (Lisbon): "Edge: brilliant, essential and addictive. The result of this ambitious venture, for those who have already experienced navigating the web pages of edge.org, is not only brilliant, but addictive. It interprets, it interrogates, it provokes. Each text can be a world in itself."

More EDGE Newsbytes:: http://www.edge.org/newsbytes.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


---
You are currently subscribed to edge_editions as: wheresrhys@googlemail.com

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-2881847-17333020.06691da9c6d471dcdf1278a10377548a@sand.lyris.net
Or, you can use the web form at the following URL:

http://www.edge.org/subscribe.html

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Edge 237 - Drew Endy: Engineering Biology

"Edge: brilliant, essential and addictive" PUBLICO (Lisbon)

Edge 237 - February 19, 2008

http://www.edge.org

(7,000 words)

This online EDGE edition with streaming video is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge237.html

----------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
----------------------------------------------------

The only thing that hasn't been engineered are the living things, ourselves. Again, what's the consequence of doing that at scale? Biotechnology is 30 years old; it's a young adult. Most of the work is still to come, but how do we actually do it? Let's not talk about it, let's actually go do it, and then let's deal with the consequences in terms of how this is going to change ourselves, how the biosecurity framework needs to recognize that it's not going to be nation-state driven work necessarily, how an ownership sharing and innovation framework needs to be developed that moves beyond patent-based intellectual property and recognizes that the information defining the genetic material's going to be more important than the stuff itself and so you might transition away from patents to copyright and so on and so forth.

ENGINEERING BIOLOGY
A Talk with Drew Endy

EDGE VIDEO

DREW ENDY, is Assistant Professor of Biological Engineering at MIT, where he is working to enable the design and construction of large scale integrated biological systems, and to develop and improve general methods for representing cellular behavior.

More
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge237.html

----------------------------------------------------
EDGE IN THE NEWS
----------------------------------------------------

THE SUN HERALD (Sydney, Australia)
February 17, 2008
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge237.html#sh

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

WEB DIARY (Australia)
February 17, 2008
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge237.html#wd

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

This online EDGE edition is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge237.html

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
EDGE

John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher
Karla Taylor, Editorial Assistant

Copyright (c) 2008 by EDGE Foundation, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Published by EDGE Foundation, Inc.,
5 East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022

Edge Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


---
You are currently subscribed to edge_editions as: wheresrhys@googlemail.com

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-2879194-17333020.06691da9c6d471dcdf1278a10377548a@sand.lyris.net
Or, you can use the web form at the following URL:

http://www.edge.org/subscribe.html

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Edge 236: Presidential Candidates IAT: Banaji & Greenwald

Edge 236 - February 12, 2008

THE EDGE CAUCUS EDITION
http://www.edge.org
[4,900 words]

This online EDGE edition (with links and Edge Video) is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge236.html

----------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
----------------------------------------------------

THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST
A Talk with Mahzarin Banaji and Anthony Greenwald

[Edge video]

BANAJI: What is remarkable about this test, which is called the Implicit Association Test-the IAT-is that it allows you to be a subject in your own experiment. Most scientists do not have the remarkable experience of being the object of study in their own research.

GREENWALD: The IAT provides a useful window into some otherwise difficult-to-detect contents of our minds. In some cases, we find things we did not know were there. It may be "an inconvenient truth" that what's there is not what we thought was there or want to be there. But I think it is generally something we can come to grips with.

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge236.html
----------------------------------------------------
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IAT

The Presidential tests are based on an assumption central to our research:
We may not know our implicit, less conscious preferences.

So, take the test to see how its result matches up to your consciously expressed choice of candidate.

The political preference test is interesting because a voting decision is made quite deliberately. The candidate you explicitly endorse is likely to be the candidate you will vote for - even if the IAT should predict a different preference.

Yet if the IAT suggests a different candidate preference than the one you believe yourself to have, it can be the basis of interesting self-examination of why such divergence exists.

[Proceed to either the Democratic Candidates task or the Republican Candidates task.]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge236.html
----------------------------------------------------
EDGE IN THE NEWS
----------------------------------------------------

CONDE NAST PORTFOLIO
February 11, 2008

TECH OBSERVER
by Kevin Maney

Daily Brew: Valuable Reasons to Check Your Kid's Closet

RacketBoy.com: They must be lying around the house somewhere. (Try your kid's closet). The rarest and most valuable Super Nintendo video games.

NYTimes.com: In the country of record debt and credit card lovin', how do Americans spend their money?

LATimes.com: The upside of pollution--all our man-made junk is giving life to a new breed of organism.

Edge.org: From the existence of ghosts to losing faith in equality, the world's top scientific thinkers change their minds on some provocative issues.

SmashingMagazine.com: 10 principles of effective web design in the age of A.D.D.

--Kevin Maney and Andrea Chalupa

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
This online EDGE edition (with links and Edge Video) is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge236.html
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
EDGE

John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher
Karla Taylor, Editorial Assistant

Copyright (c) 2008 by EDGE Foundation, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Published by EDGE Foundation, Inc.,
5 East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022

EDGE Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit private operating foundation under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
---
You are currently subscribed to edge_editions as: wheresrhys@googlemail.com

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-2875345-17333020S@sand.lyris.net
Or, you can use the web form at the following URL:

http://www.edge.org/subscribe.html

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Edge 235: Kevin Kelly: Better Than Free; Venter & Dawkins: Video

"Edge: brilliant, essential and addictive" PUBLICO (Lisbon)

Edge 235 - February 6, 2008

http://www.edge.org

[15,900 words]

This online EDGE edition is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html

----------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
----------------------------------------------------

LIFE: A GENE-CENTRIC VIEW
Craig Venter & Richard Dawkins: A Conversation in Munich
(Moderator: John Brockman)
NOW AVAILABLE: COMPLETE ONE-HOUR VIDEO & TRANSCRIPT

BETTER THAN FREE
By Kevin Kelly

----------------------------------------------------
EDGE IN THE NEWS
----------------------------------------------------

PUBLICO (Lisbon)
Cover Story, Sunday Magazine
When the world's great scientific thinkers change their minds
By Ana Gerschenfeld

WALL STREET JOURNAL
A Sense of the Future
Scientists, writers, athletes and others try to see what lies ahead
By Paul Boutin

THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS
The Triumph of Stephen Jay Gould
By Richard C. Lewontin

TIMES COLONIST (Victoria, British Columbia)
Boffins wax poetic about their passions; Mainstream media, readers seem
scared despite fine writing, fascinating facts
By Barbara Julien

----------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
----------------------------------------------------

CRAIG VENTER: One of the exciting elements that people who are interested in the digital world here may find is we can use the genetic code to watermark chromosomes. You can use it in a secret code, or you can?basically what we're using is the three-letter triplet code that codes for amino acids. There's 20 amino acids, and they use single letters to denote those. Using the triplet code, we can write words, sentences, we can say, "This genome was made by Richard Dawkins on this date in 2008." A key hallmark of man-made species, manmade chromosomes, is that they will be very much denoted that way.

RICHARD DAWKINS: What has happened is that genetics has become a branch of information technology. It is pure information. It's digital information. It's precisely the kind of information that can be translated digit for digit, byte for byte, into any other kind of information and then translated back again. This is a major revolution. I suppose it's probably "the" major revolution in the whole history of our understanding of ourselves. It's something would have boggled the mind of Darwin, and Darwin would have loved it, I'm absolutely sure.

LIFE: A GENE-CENTRIC VIEW
Craig Venter & Richard Dawkins: A Conversation in Munich
(Moderator: John Brockman)

It's not everyday you have Richard Dawkins and Craig Venter on a stage talking for an hour about "Life: A Gene-Centric View". That it occurred in Germany, where the culture has been resistant to open discussion of genetics, and at DLD, the Digital, Life, Design conference organized by Hubert Burda Media in Munich, a high-level event for the digital elite - the movers and shakers of the Internet - was particularly interesting. This event was a continuation of the EDGE "Life: What a Concept!" meeting in August, 2008.

EDGE is pleased to report on the event:

- the complete one hour video;

- the verbatim transcript;

- a sampling of the press from event articles in Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Spiegel Online, and Stern.

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html

----------------------------------------------------
SUEDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG
22. Januar 2008 FEUILLETON

The future of Selection: Scientists Craig Venter and Richard Dawkins in Munich (Die Zukunft der Selektion)

Digital or biological? There was a moment during Munich's conference about the future at DLD ( Digital Life Design) this past Monday, that felt like the exchage of a baton. After a rather dull discussion about social platforms on the internet a burly man entered the stage,introduced himself as John Brockman and proclaimed that the topic of the hour would now be biology.

John Brockman was not just another moderator. In the late summer of 2007 he hosted the now legendary symposium 'Life: What a Concept!' at his farm in Connceticut. This was where six pioneers of science had jointly proclaimed a new era: After the decyphering of the human genome soon whole genomes sequences could be written. That would be the beginning of the age of biology.

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html

----------------------------------------------------

SPIEGEL ONLINE
January 22, 2008

GENETICS REVOLUTION


Craig Venter wants to email life (Craig Venter will Lebewesen e-mailen
By Christian Stocker

Amidst all the enthusiasm for technology, one conversation had more explosive potential than the talking points of all the old and new digital entrepreneurs put together.

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html

----------------------------------------------------

STERN
January 23, 2008

When Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary biologist and dispeller of the God delusion, and Craig Venter, who first decoded the human genome, come together for their conversation, the audience feels privileged to listen in, and strains to follow their not-entirely-easy-to-follow lines of reasoning. The two thinkers are in agreement that, as Dawkins put it, "genetics has entered the realm of information technology." The growing understanding of our genetic makeup and the complex interplay of our genes has been "the biggest revolution in the history of human self-knowledge."

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

BETTER THAN FREE
By Kevin Kelly

This super-distribution system has become the foundation of our economy and wealth. The instant reduplication of data, ideas, and media underpins all the major economic sectors in our economy, particularly those involved with exports - that is, those industries where the US has a competitive advantage. Our wealth sits upon a very large device that copies promiscuously and constantly.

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html#kelly

----------------------------------------------------
EDGE IN THE NEWS
----------------------------------------------------

"Edge: brilliant, essential and addictive"

PUBLICO
14 Jan 2008 Lisbon

Front Page

Science
History Shows That Famous Thinkers Also Get It Wrong. And they admit it

Cover Story, Sunday Magazine
When the world's great scientific thinkers change their minds

One hundred and sixty-five eminent thinkers, researchers, and communicators, at the annual request of the edge.org website, answered the following question: "What Have You Changed Your Mind About? Why?"

Ana Gerschenfeld

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html#publico

----------------------------------------------------

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ? WEEKEND JOURNAL, Page W8
January 26, 2008

BOOKS

A Sense of the Future

Scientists, writers, athletes and others try to see what lies ahead
By Paul Boutin

...Not surprisingly, the most detailed predictions in both books come from information technologists. Second-guessing current trends is, after all, an integral part of their work. Taken together, the optimistic visions of several of Mr. Brockman's Net-savvy essayists seem not just wonderful but plausible: The Internet, for all it has brought so far, is only the first step before a much bigger leap in information and interconnectivity between people. ...

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html#wsj

----------------------------------------------------

NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS
Volume 55, Number 2 February 14, 2008

The Triumph of Stephen Jay Gould
By Richard C. Lewontin

Some depart entirely from their expertise and build a public career with only the slimmest connection to their professional knowledge. It will not be obvious to the readers of Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel that he is, in fact, a physiologist and an expert in tropical biogeography. Still others are public figures concerned with political questions quite separate from the content of their intellectual accomplishment. Noam Chomsky's politics have nothing to do with his theory of universal grammar, although he might gain attention for his political arguments because we already know that he is very smart. It is even possible to become a public intellectual in science with no institutional home in a technical discipline. Richard Dawkins, who was trained as a biologist and who obviously knows a great deal about genetics and evolution, is Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford. ...

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html#nyrb

----------------------------------------------------

TIMES COLONIST (Victoria, British Columbia)
January 27, 2008 Sunday

Boffins wax poetic about their passions; Mainstream media, readers seem scared despite fine writing, fascinating facts
By Barbara Julian, Special to the Times Colonist

In its roundup of best books of 2007, The Economist claimed that "there is something for everyone" - but there wasn't.

There was not a single science title, which is curious, even for a business and political affairs periodical, given not only the technology-invention-business connection but also the fact that we are currently in a golden age of literary science writing.

That we are is affirmed by British science journalist Matt Ridley in his introduction to a recent collection of essays on evolution. Scientists, says Ridley, "(are) writers and their currency (is) words: poetic flights of fancy, ample use of metaphor, and personal appeals to the reader."

Many editors, reviewers and other publicists don't seem to have heard the news, however. Not only The Economist but also the Globe & Mail and the New York Times snubbed 2007's science titles. ...

...In his Christmas Day sermon, the Archbishop of Canterbury praised his compatriot Richard Dawkins for expressing humanity's "amazement and awe" at nature, and urged people to treat nature with "reverence." It seems that for some, the famous long cultural war between science and the humanities can now be over, and that "science literature" can now be literature.

That is certainly the opinion of editor John Brockman whose exhilarating science site "edge.org" profiles dozens of groundbreaking scienists by asking them an annual New Year's Big Question. This year's is "What Have You Changed Your Mind About?"

Their answers add up to, roughly, "everything." That is what science frees thinkers to do: change their theories as new evidence comes in. Most responders one way or another emphasized the ethical demands of good science, and described scientific work as subjective, dynamic and creative - rather like the humanities, in fact.

[More]
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html#times

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
This online EDGE edition is available at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge235.html

----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
EDGE

John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher
Karla Taylor, Editorial Assistant

Copyright (c) 2008 by EDGE Foundation, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Published by EDGE Foundation, Inc.,
5 East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022

EDGE Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


---
You are currently subscribed to edge_editions as: wheresrhys@googlemail.com

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-2868065-17333020S@sand.lyris.net
Or, you can use the web form at the following URL:

http://www.edge.org/subscribe.html